Saucony mentioned in the four running shoes, I believe that the friends who often run are no strangers. In recent years, the brand new materials battles stand out. Many professional main series have also completed the change of EVERUN new materials. Today, the evaluation room also selected Saucony two. Different positioning shoes, Freedom ISO 2 and Triumph ISO 4, let us see what is the difference between the two running shoes at the end?
The positioning of the two running shoes is different. The Freedom ISO 2 is lighter in weight. For the runners who have a certain pursuit of speed, the Freedom series can be used in addition to the daily training,Futurecraft Leather and the Triumph ISO 4 belongs to the top. The cushioning series is more suitable for daily jogging. It is a good choice for heavy-weight runners. Both of them are also suitable for normal gait runners, and the pricing is exactly the same, which can be selected according to individual needs.
Upper
Putting the adidas Originals Tubular X White Camo two shoes together, you can easily find that the appearance of the two is obviously different. The Freedom ISO 2 has a long buttock, the upper mesh is larger, and the thickness of the tongue is thinner. The Triumph ISO 4 is obviously wider and larger. The mesh is denser and the tongue is significantly thicker. Of course, there are also common shoes. The uppers of the two shoes have no obvious supporting materials. They are very soft. At the same time, the ISOFIT structure is used on both sides. Of course, it is still necessary to remind everyone of the running friends that the actual comparison of the two shoes is Triumph ISO 4 is wider than Freedom ISO 2.
Midsole
Both shoes use the full-arm EVERUN new midsole material. It is mentioned here that the Freedom ISO 2 and the 1st generation actually have little change in the midsole, but the Triumph ISO 4 changes compared to the previous generation. More obvious, these two running shoes have abandoned the superposition of various technical materials of the previous running shoes. The more comprehensive use of the whole piece of Everun material, which counts as Saucony's outstanding black technology in recent years, the official claim that Everun can provide 83 % of energy rebounds. From the experience of adidas Ultra Tech Vegeta running shoes with Everun materials, the durability is good. The weight of the Triumph ISO 4 is obviously thicker than the Freedom ISO 2, and the cushioning effect is more prominent. .
Outsole
The Freedom ISO 2 outsole uses a full-piece clear crystal outsole for a bolder design, while the Triumph ISO 4 outsole is relatively traditional.
Performance
In the past few years, Saucony has made a real fire with the ISOFIT and EVERUN midsole. Many of the previous products have won many awards abroad. These two running shoes all use the full-chip EVERUN midsole. What is the difference? It also gives people more expectation about the performance of the two.
The two shoes can be seen on the sole side of the EVERUN. The granular appearance is not reminiscent of BOOST. Don’t look at people with similar appearance, but you will find that there is still a difference between the two. Big difference, EVERUN density is actually bigger, the sole is harder and more elastic than the traditional BOOST, the feedback on the road is more direct, and it is more labor-saving to run in a simpler language than BOOST. However, the cushioning effect is much better than the common EVA material running shoes. Although the whole piece of EVERUN material is much simpler in structure, the actual experience is really better than the midsole of the material splicing. There is no difference between the forefoot and the forefoot. So that no matter what kind of landing method you are, you can compare it with ease. What is the difference between the two legs? EVERUN's new material adjustment is already in place. The upper foot does not need any running-in to feel the rebound of the midsole under the foot. If Freedom ISO 2 brings the soft bullet to the runner, then Triumph The feeling of ISO 4 is even stronger, especially in the heel position. This kind of flexibility must be derived from its thicker heel.
Of course, the two shoes are similar to EVERUN because of the material in the midsole. The part that makes people doubt is the stability problem. The stability of Freedom ISO 2 is not perfect, because the whole midsole The softness is high and there is no increase in the stability module, which makes it less sturdy if the rollover occurs under running, and the Triumph ISO 4 is relatively better because the designer has widened its heel position. Processing, we deliberately compare the two heel photos, it can be clearly seen that the Triumph ISO 4 is much wider, which has obvious advantages in running and heel landing, the wide heel reduces the shaking of the sole to some extent, of course The design without the stability module still makes people feel that there is something missing in the bottom. We also specially took a comparison chart of the two and the compression, I believe it will be more intuitive.
The uppers of the two shoes are better, the mesh material is softer, and the wrapping is more natural. The ISOFIT on both sides of the shoe has a certain supporting effect. The Triumph ISO 4 has a wider foot and is more suitable for the foot. Runner. At the same time, the thickness of the tongue is different. The Triumph ISO 4 is thicker and wider, which is more comfortable. The Freedom ISO 2 is lighter and thinner. The breathability is better because the mesh of the Freedom ISO 2 upper is larger. .
Freedom ISO 2 and Triumph ISO 4 are the two most expensive flagship running shoes in Saucony's domestic market. They are extremely distinctive running shoes. The EVERUN midsole material of the whole palm really brings a completely different experience. Both are suitable for normal gait running. For those who are lighter, choose Freedom ISO 2, and the natural weight of the natural Triumph ISO 4 is more suitable cheap jordans free shipping.
The positioning of the two running shoes is different. The Freedom ISO 2 is lighter in weight. For the runners who have a certain pursuit of speed, the Freedom series can be used in addition to the daily training,Futurecraft Leather and the Triumph ISO 4 belongs to the top. The cushioning series is more suitable for daily jogging. It is a good choice for heavy-weight runners. Both of them are also suitable for normal gait runners, and the pricing is exactly the same, which can be selected according to individual needs.
Upper
Putting the adidas Originals Tubular X White Camo two shoes together, you can easily find that the appearance of the two is obviously different. The Freedom ISO 2 has a long buttock, the upper mesh is larger, and the thickness of the tongue is thinner. The Triumph ISO 4 is obviously wider and larger. The mesh is denser and the tongue is significantly thicker. Of course, there are also common shoes. The uppers of the two shoes have no obvious supporting materials. They are very soft. At the same time, the ISOFIT structure is used on both sides. Of course, it is still necessary to remind everyone of the running friends that the actual comparison of the two shoes is Triumph ISO 4 is wider than Freedom ISO 2.
Midsole
Both shoes use the full-arm EVERUN new midsole material. It is mentioned here that the Freedom ISO 2 and the 1st generation actually have little change in the midsole, but the Triumph ISO 4 changes compared to the previous generation. More obvious, these two running shoes have abandoned the superposition of various technical materials of the previous running shoes. The more comprehensive use of the whole piece of Everun material, which counts as Saucony's outstanding black technology in recent years, the official claim that Everun can provide 83 % of energy rebounds. From the experience of adidas Ultra Tech Vegeta running shoes with Everun materials, the durability is good. The weight of the Triumph ISO 4 is obviously thicker than the Freedom ISO 2, and the cushioning effect is more prominent. .
Outsole
The Freedom ISO 2 outsole uses a full-piece clear crystal outsole for a bolder design, while the Triumph ISO 4 outsole is relatively traditional.
Performance
In the past few years, Saucony has made a real fire with the ISOFIT and EVERUN midsole. Many of the previous products have won many awards abroad. These two running shoes all use the full-chip EVERUN midsole. What is the difference? It also gives people more expectation about the performance of the two.
The two shoes can be seen on the sole side of the EVERUN. The granular appearance is not reminiscent of BOOST. Don’t look at people with similar appearance, but you will find that there is still a difference between the two. Big difference, EVERUN density is actually bigger, the sole is harder and more elastic than the traditional BOOST, the feedback on the road is more direct, and it is more labor-saving to run in a simpler language than BOOST. However, the cushioning effect is much better than the common EVA material running shoes. Although the whole piece of EVERUN material is much simpler in structure, the actual experience is really better than the midsole of the material splicing. There is no difference between the forefoot and the forefoot. So that no matter what kind of landing method you are, you can compare it with ease. What is the difference between the two legs? EVERUN's new material adjustment is already in place. The upper foot does not need any running-in to feel the rebound of the midsole under the foot. If Freedom ISO 2 brings the soft bullet to the runner, then Triumph The feeling of ISO 4 is even stronger, especially in the heel position. This kind of flexibility must be derived from its thicker heel.
Of course, the two shoes are similar to EVERUN because of the material in the midsole. The part that makes people doubt is the stability problem. The stability of Freedom ISO 2 is not perfect, because the whole midsole The softness is high and there is no increase in the stability module, which makes it less sturdy if the rollover occurs under running, and the Triumph ISO 4 is relatively better because the designer has widened its heel position. Processing, we deliberately compare the two heel photos, it can be clearly seen that the Triumph ISO 4 is much wider, which has obvious advantages in running and heel landing, the wide heel reduces the shaking of the sole to some extent, of course The design without the stability module still makes people feel that there is something missing in the bottom. We also specially took a comparison chart of the two and the compression, I believe it will be more intuitive.
The uppers of the two shoes are better, the mesh material is softer, and the wrapping is more natural. The ISOFIT on both sides of the shoe has a certain supporting effect. The Triumph ISO 4 has a wider foot and is more suitable for the foot. Runner. At the same time, the thickness of the tongue is different. The Triumph ISO 4 is thicker and wider, which is more comfortable. The Freedom ISO 2 is lighter and thinner. The breathability is better because the mesh of the Freedom ISO 2 upper is larger. .
Freedom ISO 2 and Triumph ISO 4 are the two most expensive flagship running shoes in Saucony's domestic market. They are extremely distinctive running shoes. The EVERUN midsole material of the whole palm really brings a completely different experience. Both are suitable for normal gait running. For those who are lighter, choose Freedom ISO 2, and the natural weight of the natural Triumph ISO 4 is more suitable cheap jordans free shipping.
No comments:
Post a Comment